Should WELS Congregations Serve ALL Students?

Written by Dr. Lawrence Olson

“Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.” (Matthew 28:19-20)

Making disciples: that’s the mission that God has given us. What a sacred responsibility! What a glorious privilege!

Readers of this blog may have noted that the question posed in the title above is patterned after a previous posting on this site that asked a similar question: “Should WELS Schools Serve ALL Students?” (emphasis added).[1] The author stated, “When staff cannot meet the educational needs of a student with a disability and thereby must send the student away, WELS schools have failed to provide the child with a Christ-centered education.” She concluded, “As we move forward and steps are taken to increase the number of individuals educated in this area, the hope is that we will stop turning students away because of special needs.”

A Christ-Centered Education

Let’s start with the concept of “a Christ-centered education.” My contention is that we should not equate that with any specific congregational program, including a Lutheran elementary school. An LES can be a wonderful strategic component in disciple-making, but ultimately the best “full-time Christian education” – modeled after Deuteronomy 6 and 11 – is provided by committed, faithful fathers and mothers who understand their critical, God-given role as “full-time Christian parents.” Those parents then partner with their church to nurture their children so that they can “grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ” (2 Peter 3:18).

How many of our congregations have an LES? Almost exactly one in four, 25%.[2] How many of our congregations have programs of Christian education? All of them, 100%. Regardless of what specific program components an individual congregation may or may not have, we should take to heart the biblical perspective voiced by Ben Freudenburg[3]: “Parents are the primary Christian educators in the church, and the family is the God-ordained institution for faith-building in children and youth and for the passing of faith from one generation to the next.”[4] That is true for parents in all of our congregations, both with and without an LES; it is true for parents of a child with special educational needs and for parents of a child with typical educational needs. And the congregations that partner with those parents, whether they are one of the one-in-four or one of the three-in-four, need to consider the specific educational needs of each child entrusted to them as they nurture them in the faith.

Differences in Disability Require Differentiated Approaches

“Special education,” “special needs,” and “disabilities” are all expansive umbrella terms that cover a broad range of different items: visual or hearing impairment, ADD/ADHD, Down Syndrome, dyslexia, Autism Spectrum Disorders, EBD, developmental aphasia, and so on. The federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, originally passed by Congress in 1975 and updated several times since then, includes 14 general categories.[5] Within those categories there is also a range of disability; it is common for many of those categories to be evaluated as mild, moderate, severe, or profound. This reminds us of what good teachers have always known: individual differences need to be taken into account in order for there to be effective teaching and learning.

Dr. Alan Spurgin, in a previous entry in this blog, framed this point well: “Teachers need to work individually with all the children in the classroom. The key question is, How can teachers work with students of widely different abilities?” He went on to describe the answer provided by the “positive approach” of “differentiated instruction.” [6] That approach, which applies to what happens within an individual classroom, can be profitably broadened as we work with individual children with disabilities and their families.

Here’s what I mean. Depending on the nature and severity of the disability, a congregation with an LES might provide any one of the following options:

  • Enrollment in the LES with appropriate accommodation by the teacher(s)
  • Enrollment in the LES with accommodation and with support by a paraprofessional
  • Enrollment in the LES with specific specialized education services provided by the local public school district
  • Shared-time  enrollment in both the LES and the public school
  • Enrollment in the public school with spiritual instruction from the congregation
  • Home schooling with spiritual instruction from the congregation

Recognizing Our Limits

The typical WELS Lutheran elementary school has an enrollment of 70-75 students and a faculty of 3-4 teachers. Our teachers, most of whom serve in multi-grade classrooms, selflessly serve their Savior by investing long hours in their calling. They may not be able to free up the time needed to help a child with a disability succeed while still effectively serving the students with typical educational needs; even if they had the time, few may have the training and experience necessary to deal with a specific disability, especially if that disability is severe or profound. In addition, it is not uncommon for a child with a disability to need a one-on-one special education paraprofessional to succeed in the classroom, and a congregation may not have the financial resources needed to add those positions.

MLC has just launched a special education major that will lead to Minnesota state licensure as an Academic and Behavioral Strategist (ABS). The purpose of this initial license is to train teachers “to provide services to students with mild to moderate needs across a variety of disability categories.” That license is valid for five years; to renew it requires that a teacher “must also have a disability-specific license in one of the four licensure fields represented within the ABS license: Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD), Developmental Disabilities (DD), Emotional or Behavior Disorders (EBD), Learning Disabilities (LD).”[7]

The reality is that few, if any, of our schools would be able to call a fulltime special education teacher. What excites us about this new major is the opportunity to equip those who will serve as regular classroom teachers to be a helpful resource for the congregation’s special-needs children, their families, and the school faculty. With their multiple disability background, these teachers would also be uniquely equipped to serve as a liaison with the local public school district in accessing special education services available through it.

Not “Turning Away,” but Walking With

Paul talks about “speaking the truth in love” (Ephesians 4:15). Sometimes love requires us to say things that are difficult but true. One of those things may be to say, “We love your child, and we treasure her as a child of God. However, because of her specific educational needs, our school doesn’t have the resources necessary to allow her to make the most of her God-given gifts. We will, of course, continue to support you and work with you as together we nurture her in the faith. And we will assist you as you work with the public schools to find the most appropriate educational path for her.”

I began my ministry some 30 years ago as a pastor in a mission congregation that was one of the three-in-four: we did not have an LES. There was a young man in our church with physical and cognitive disabilities. Specialists at several elite institutions, including the Mayo Clinic, were unable to identify his mysterious and progressive disorder. He would not have benefitted from our regular Sunday school or confirmation class. Instead, we provided one-on-one teaching and instruction, making use of the experience and expertise of a woman who was a special education teacher in an area public school. That young man was eventually confirmed, and he received the body and blood of his Savior in the Lord’s Supper. Today his disabilities are behind him as he celebrates at the wedding feast of the Lamb.

We did not fail that child or his family; one path is not appropriate for every child or family. However, whether that path includes an LES or not, whether that path includes the regular Sunday school and confirmation class or not, it is the responsibility and privilege of our congregations to walk those paths with them.

Answering the Questions

Let’s return to those questions. “Should WELS Schools Serve ALL Students?” No, not always. We can say that without any guilt or shame because the answer to the question, “Should WELS Congregations Serve ALL Students?” is yes. Always.

Dr. Lawrence Olson served as a parish pastor in Illinois from 1983 to 1993. Since then he has been a professor at Martin Luther College in New Ulm, MN, where he teaches a variety of undergraduate courses in practical theology, Christian doctrine, and biblical history and literature, and the graduate course Foundations of Ministry. He also serves as the Director of the Staff Ministry Program and of the Congregational Assistant Program.

References

[1] Emser, Tracy. “Should WELS Schools Serve ALL Students?” Issues in Lutheran Education, April 2, 2013.

[2] WELS 2012 Statistical Report.

[3] Freudenberg is a church worker in the Missouri Synod with more than 40 years of experience as a Director of Christian Education; we in the WELS would call him a staff minister. He currently is a professor in the graduate Family Life Program of Concordia University Nebraska.

[4] Freudenburg, Ben with Rick Lawrence. The Family Friendly Church. Loveland, CO: Group Publishing, 1998.

[5] National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities. Retrieved from http://nichcy.org/disability/categories.

[6] Spurgin, Alan. “Should Lutheran Teachers Use Differentiated Instruction?” Issues in Lutheran Education, February 13, 2014; “Differentiated Instruction: Helping All Your Students Achieve,” ibid., February 13, 2014.

[7] Minnesota Board of Teaching, “Frequently Asked Questions about the Academic and Behavioral Strategist (ABS) License.” Retrieved from http://www.education.state.mn.us/MDE/EdExc/Licen/SpecEdLicen/.

4 thoughts on “Should WELS Congregations Serve ALL Students?

  1. Dr. Olson,

    Thank you for this excellent article. I have a two year old son with cerebral palsy due to complications at birth, however, he is very intelligent and is blessed with excellent problem solving skills. We have him involved in our local early intervention program that provides him with three different therapists.

    We are members at St. Peter Lutheran/The Core in Appleton, WI. However, we live in Little Chute, WI. I would love to send my son to St. Peter’s Lutheran School, especially now that we are starting a 3K and 4K program. Unfortunately, we are finding that in order for him to receive services, he needs to remain in the district where he resides.

    With that being said, no matter where my son goes to school, it should always be our responsibility as parents to be the ones to nurture our children’s faith in raising them to know Christ’s love and teaching them true Christian morals. I strongly agree that our congregations should serve ALL students. They do this by nurturing the faith of the parents and tailoring to the needs of children who have disabilities.

    Thank you again for bringing to light a sensitive subject in how congregations are to reach out to children who have disabilities.

    In Christ,
    Timothy Walker

  2. Dr. Olson,

    Thank you for your reasoned post. As a parent of a Down Syndrome child and a pastor, I understand how delicate and difficult this issue is. In my experience, the answer is never easy, clear, nor necessarily fair, as most understand that term. I am thrilled that MLC is expanding it’s offerings in this area. God bless that work. It is complex beyond measure.

    Nothing has made me realize and appreciate more how difficult that task is as having a child with special needs. However, I do believe that some schools in the WELS have been all too quick to write off these opportunities because they aren’t traditional, typical, and don’t fit into the box of general expectations. And yes, enrolling even one of these children is going to make more work.

    But, having a special needs child of my own has made me better appreciate the different gifts and abilities of my other children as well. I suspect it’s having the same impact on our faculty as they work with my daughter and support us as we consider the challenges of drawing up IEPs and service plans.

    Small schools, though they may not have all of the financial resources and multiple students to justify a specialist, also are a little less encumbered by the challenges that sometimes come with having a larger and more diverse student body. Thus, they might be able to be a little more flexible in meeting the specific needs of their students.

    It won’t be easy. There is a need for balance. Communication is a key. There are a host of other warnings and considerations to be sure, (some of which you touched on). But we dare not be afraid to consider the opportunities to provide the appropriate educational assistance to parents of special needs children also through our school or because of that fear, simply default to what we’ve always done, especially in a world where even so-called traditional education is more and more specialized and diverse.

    The jury is still out on our test and my family and our faculty discuss it frequently, and having more resources and awareness will certainly help, but it is truly a blessing for us even now.

    Dave Rau

  3. Excellent article, one that deals in a sensitive and helpful way with a difficult subject. I would hope that most of our W/ELS church leaders, including those not blessed by a local LES, would have the opportunity to read this to encourage them in their responsibilities toward children gifted differently from others in their flocks.

  4. Dr. Olson,

    Thanks for your article. It provides the kind of balance that any discussion of this difficult question deserves. The quotation from Ben Freudenberg is spot on. And your extension of that simple biblical principle from Deuteronomy 6 (also 11) is the kind of clear-headed theology we need in the WELS to lead all Christian parents to recognize their God-given role as the the primary spiritual nurturers of their own dear children.

    Kenn Kremer

Please, share YOUR thoughts!